MARK–RECAPTURE AND DNA FINGERPRINTING DATA REVEAL HIGH BREEDING-SITE FIDELITY, LOW NATAL PHILOPATRY, AND LOW LEVELS OF GENETIC POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN FLAMMULATED OWLS (OTUS FLAMMEOLUS)

The Auk ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 329 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Arsenault ◽  
Peter B. Stacey ◽  
Guy A. Hoelzer
The Auk ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-337
Author(s):  
David P. Arsenault ◽  
Peter B. Stacey ◽  
Guy A. Hoelzer

AbstractOver a seven-year period, we used mark-recapture in a population of Flammulated Owls (Otus flammeolus) in the Zuni Mountains, New Mexico, to estimate adult breeding-site fidelity, mate fidelity, natal philopatry, and dispersal distances. We also used DNA fingerprinting to examine the genetic population structure of Flammulated Owls among four mountain ranges in New Mexico and one range in Utah. Mark-recapture revealed that adults are site-faithful and tend to maintain pair bonds between years, whereas juveniles show little natal philopatry. DNA fingerprinting revealed very low differentiation among populations, even between the New Mexico and Utah ranges, with population subdivision (FST) estimates ranging from 0.00 to 0.04. Heterozygosity values were high within each mountain range and, together with the low FST values, suggest that this Neotropical migrant may have long-distance natal dispersal and frequent intermountain dispersal.Datos de Marcado-Recaptura y Huellas Dactilares de ADN Revelan Alta Fidelidad a los Sitios de Cría, Baja Filopatría Natal y Bajos Niveles de Diferenciación Genética Poblacional en Otus flammeolus


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 810
Author(s):  
Berner

This note is to correct an error in my paper, concerning the Shannon differentiation metric (DShannon) (Reference [43] in the paper). The paper states that DShannon is undefined mathematically whenever one or both populations are monomorphic, that is, fixed for a single allele. Accordingly, the DShannon curve in Figure 1a, showing population differentiation in relation to allele counts for the case in which the pooled minor allele frequency (MAF) is maximal, did not extend across the full range of allele counts; the rightmost data point reflecting complete population differentiation was missing. Moreover, DShannon was completely missing in Figure 1b visualizing the continuum of allele frequency differentiation when the MAF is minimal (one population monomorphic across the entire allele count range).


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1489-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Arens ◽  
Theo van der Sluis ◽  
Wendy P. C. van’t Westende ◽  
Ben Vosman ◽  
Claire C. Vos ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e3311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Motamayor ◽  
Philippe Lachenaud ◽  
Jay Wallace da Silva e Mota ◽  
Rey Loor ◽  
David N. Kuhn ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berner

Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is FST. Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that FST does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, FST (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to FST. I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 965-972
Author(s):  
Martin Haase ◽  
Henriette Höltje ◽  
Beate Blahy ◽  
Damon Bridge ◽  
Eberhard Henne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document